Grant Butler
Partner
Adam Smith
Partner
Robert Tammero
Partner

It is a challenging time for many banks.

The rapid, sustained increase in interest rates is making it more difficult for banks to maintain margins. The high-profile bank runs in spring 2023 have resulted in increased regulatory scrutiny in many areas, including liquidity and risk management. Merger and acquisition activity has been subdued. As a result of these challenges, some banks are hunkering down until the economic environment turns more favorable.

However, these challenges also present opportunities for strategic growth. Regardless of a bank’s particular situation, it is a good time to review strategic positioning and options, including opportunities afforded by a bank holding company and new customer acquisition channels.

Holding Company Advantage
Many banks are directly owned by a holding company. This structure can be an advantage that executives and directors should consider as part of a bank’s strategic planning. For one, a holding company allows nonbanking activities to be conducted “outside the bank.” Some banks might find it advantageous, for example, to separate noninterest income-generating business lines, such as trust, investment advisory or insurance, from their core banking business by holding these businesses in separate subsidiaries of the bank’s holding company. Others might find the ability to have separate banks owned by a single holding company helps facilitate a strategic acquisition of another bank.

Keeping an acquired bank legally separate — even if only temporarily — can allow for a measure of autonomy and brand separation that may be attractive to a bank that is otherwise hesitant to be acquired.

Bank holding companies also have the ability to make noncontrolling investments in companies engaged in activities that may not be permissible for a bank. This can be particularly useful when a bank wishes to affiliate with a fintech company through a joint venture or in a manner that might result in a direct equity investment in the fintech company.

Bank holding companies also have the advantage of being able to raise capital by borrowing, with the loan proceeds treated as Tier 2 capital at the holding company and Tier 1 capital if contributed to the bank. For qualifying bank holding companies with less than $3 billion in consolidated assets, the flexibility regarding leverage afforded by the Federal Reserve’s Small Bank Holding Company Policy Statement can make subordinated debt a particularly attractive option for financing acquisitions and other growth investments. Although current interest rates make raising capital through borrowing relatively unattractive, when the interest rate environment improves, banks may wish to bolster their Tier 1 capital through subordinated debt offerings by their holding companies.

Customer Acquisition Channels
New customer acquisition is as important — and as challenging — as ever for many banks. Some banks are tackling this challenge by narrowing their scope. Niche banking, where a bank focuses its products, services and marketing efforts on a certain segment of customers (usually other than based on geography alone), is becoming more pervasive and is proving to be an effective strategy for some banks in attracting and retaining customers.

Other banks are focusing heavily on the online market by partnering with companies that help funnel prospective customers to a bank’s existing brand or, in some cases, to a separately branded online bank within the bank. This latter approach may allow a bank to offer specialized products and services to prospective customers outside of its existing market through an online-only platform, without the cost of a branch network.

Fintech partnerships, especially those that give a bank access to low-cost deposits at scale, are steadily increasing in number and prevalence in banks’ strategic plans. Earlier this year, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency jointly issued guidance on risk management of banks’ third-party relationships. This guidance sets the guideposts for how banks can effectively evaluate, structure and monitor relationships with their current and prospective fintech partners.

The current interest rate environment and economic uncertainty are accelerating disruption and uncertainty in the banking industry. While this creates real, and in some cases existential, challenges for some banks, it also creates opportunity. The number of possible strategic paths a bank could pursue has never been greater.

WRITTEN BY

Grant Butler

Partner

Grant Butler is a partner at K&L Gates LLP in the firm’s Boston office. Mr. Butler represents financial institutions, fintech companies and asset managers on a variety of regulatory and transactional matters, with particular emphasis on financial services regulatory matters, financial industry mergers and acquisitions and other financial services-related corporate transactions.

 

Mr. Butler advises clients on regulatory issues related to the Dodd-Frank Act, the structuring of domestic and foreign investments and activities in compliance with the Bank Holding Company Act, transactions between banks and affiliates, capital raising initiatives, securities and insurance activities of banks, consumer financial product offerings, fiduciary activities and structuring and operating pooled investment vehicles. Mr. Butler counsels clients with respect to corporate governance, operational matters, risk management, consumer financial regulatory matters, bank partnerships, collective investment funds, financial institution formation and reorganization transactions and choosing and structuring appropriate charters or license structures for their business needs.

WRITTEN BY

Adam Smith

Partner

Adam Smith is a partner at K&L Gates LLP, and is based out of the firm’s Nashville office.  Mr. Smith is a member of the firm’s corporate, mergers and acquisitions practice.  He represents clients across industries in connection with corporate, merger and acquisition and securities matters.  A significant portion of his practice involves the representation of regulated financial institutions.  Mr. Smith counsels both publicly traded and privately held banks and bank holding companies.  He counsels financial services companies, with respect to mergers and acquisitions, public and private offerings of debt and equity securities, corporate governance and regulatory matters and general day-to-day corporate and operational issues.

WRITTEN BY

Robert Tammero

Partner

Rob Tammero is a partner at K&L Gates LLP in the firm’s Boston office.  Mr. Tammero represents companies in a range of corporate and transactional matters, including mergers and acquisitions, debt and equity financings and corporate governance.  He advises buyers and sellers of businesses and assets, investors and companies raising capital.  Mr. Tammero’s practice includes representation of financial institutions and their holding companies, fintech companies, investment funds and other financial service providers in corporate, transactional and regulatory matters.