Jack Harrington
Partner
Robert Maddox
Partner
Gabriella Alonso
Associate

On his first day in office, President Donald Trump signed an executive order enabling the State Department to designate drug cartels as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTOs). The State Department then formally designated eight cartels as FTOs. Since that time, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network (FinCEN) has led a whole-of-government charge to combat cartel financial activity and restrict access to the U.S. financial system. In recent months, FinCEN has issued unprecedented orders and informative alerts designed to help banks recognize, report and combat these evolving threats. Financial institutions, particularly those with exposure to the Mexican or Southwest border markets, should be prepared for heightened Bank Secrecy Act/anti-money laundering (AML) regulatory scrutiny.   

The FTO designations prohibit banks and other financial services firms from conducting business with individuals and entities they suspect are connected to the cartels and mandates the immediate blocking or freezing of assets linked to them. The FTO designations also significantly heighten civil litigation risk, as victims of cartel violence could theoretically bring claims against connected banks pursuant to the Anti-Terrorism Act and related statutes. Meanwhile, the AML Whistleblower Improvement Act increased awards for those who successfully report violations of the BSA and economic sanctions to between 10% and 30% of monetary sanctions in excess of $1 million. These developments will necessarily require decision-makers to take stock of existing BSA/AML programs, including know-your-customer/customer identification programs, enhanced due diligence procedures, review of correspondent banking relationships and scrutiny of cross-border payment flows. 

Here are a few considerations.

1. Conduct a Thorough Risk Assessment
Financial institutions should conduct a thorough risk assessment to understand how their existing customer, product and geographic risk maps onto the Trump administration’s focus on cartel activity and the resulting expectations of prudential examiners. Regulators always expect a “risk-based” approach to BSA/AML and financial crime compliance. If you are not regularly examining your risk exposure to ever-changing threats, then you will not be able to convince the government of the adequacy of your BSA/AML program.

2. Update Transaction Monitoring and Customer Screening Programs
Given the FTO designations and current enforcement spotlight on cartels, financial services firms must review and update customer screening and transaction monitoring programs. FinCEN has issued a series of alerts outlining cartel-linked money laundering schemes and typologies, including trade-based money laundering. Banks need to update transaction monitoring rules and thresholds to ensure they are flagging high-risk transactions. Institutions must also ensure that relationships with a higher risk of potential cartel exposure receive enhanced and ongoing due diligence. 

3. Audit Correspondent Banking Relationships
Earlier this summer, FinCEN issued its first-ever orders under Section 2313a of the Fentanyl Sanctions Act, identifying three Mexico-based financial institutions tied to key money laundering activities. By October 20, 2025, U.S.-based financial institutions are expected to (1) implement procedures to ensure compliance with the terms of the orders; and (2) exercise reasonable due diligence to prevent engaging in transmittals of funds involving the identified banks. Banks should probe their potential exposure to the three identified institutions — CIBanco, Intercam, and Vector — and block any transactions to or from these entities. 

4. Identify and Report Suspicious Transactions
As noted above, FinCEN has issued several alerts as a roadmap to navigate industries or activities indicative of cartel-related activity. In March, FinCEN published an alert on bulk cash smuggling and repatriation schemes, explaining how cartels funnel cash into the United States from seemingly legitimate businesses. In another, FinCEN explained how cartels steal billions in crude oil from Pemex, Mexico’s state-owned oil company, and funnel it into the U.S. energy market. Most recently, FinCEN issued an advisory on the link between Chinese money laundering networks and Mexico-based drug cartels.

Financial institutions must adequately resource their compliance programs and train both first- and second-line staff to identify red flags indicative of cartel financial activity. The cross-border activity flagged by FinCEN demonstrates the need to pay attention to patterns and behavior on all cross-border transactions, not just those involving a Mexico-based entity. If identified, banks need to ensure their investigation and Suspicious Activity Report (SAR) programs accurately and efficiently report such transactions to FinCEN and/or the Office of Foreign Assets Control.

WRITTEN BY

Jack Harrington

Partner

Jack Harrington represents clients facing complex criminal, regulatory, enforcement, and reputational matters with a particular focus on the financial services, defense, and technology sectors. Prior to joining Bradley, Jack served as an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the Criminal Division of the United States Attorney’s Office in Birmingham, where he investigated and prosecuted complex fraud, money laundering, trade sanctions, cybercrime, and national security matters in partnership with the FBI and other law enforcement agencies.

WRITTEN BY

Robert Maddox

Partner

Robert Maddox is a partner at Bradley Arant Boult Cummings LLP.  In the past decade, Mr. Maddox handled more national/multi-state attorneys’ general investigations and related consent judgments than any attorney in the United States.  His work involves representing clients before the CFPB, DOJ, EOUST, OCC, FRB, HUD, SEC and multiple state regulatory agencies, including banking, finance and insurance agencies. With Bradley’s national competitive fee advantage, Mr. Maddox continued the firm’s representation post-consent judgment on most matters to handle redress of business systems, internal and external reporting, and account remediation – and still provides board training, compliance, and litigation representation to many of those same clients. Mr. Maddox stands behind his work product and advice and supports clients through challenging times and then celebrates their business successes.

WRITTEN BY

Gabriella Alonso

Associate

Gabriella Alonso represents financial institutions in corporate, regulatory, and commercial matters. After spending several years defending banks, lenders, and other members of the financial services industry in complex disputes at the state and federal level, Gabriella expanded her practice to focus on guiding financial institutions and privately held companies as they navigate industry-specific regulatory, compliance, and corporate issues. Gabriella received her J.D. from Washington & Lee University School of Law, where she was a student case worker in the Advanced Administrative Litigation Clinic and a member of the Latin American Law Students’ Association National Moot Court team.