As Chief Revenue Officer, Susan Salecky leads the revenue generation processes and marketing efforts for COCC. Sue’s responsibilities include sales management, new and current business development, product delivery, distribution channel management and generating and maintaining meaningful industry relationships. Sue also directs the strategies that increase exposure and visibility of the Company with a focus on highlighting the COCC difference. Sue earned her bachelor’s degree from the University of Connecticut and is a graduate of Stonier Graduate School of Banking.
The Right Core Vendor Relationship
A bank’s partnership with its core provider can make or break its ability to innovate and evolve its business lines.
Brought to you by COCC

*This article appears in the first quarter 2026 issue of Bank Director magazine.
Community and regional banks know core processing is the heart of their operations. But beyond software and servers, a bank’s partnership with its core provider can make or break its ability to innovate and evolve its business lines. When a core provider can offer a single, modern core solution coupled with high-touch support, it creates a model that cultivates innovation and long-term success. In fact, alignment and satisfaction between a bank and its core provider are often as critical as the technology itself.
Lukewarm Satisfaction
Recent data underscores the need to strengthen bank–core relationships. According to the American Bankers Association’s (ABA) “2024 ABA Core Platforms Survey” just over half of bankers (53%) were “extremely” or “somewhat” satisfied with their core providers. Overall satisfaction scored only 3.19 out of 5, up slightly from 3.01 in 2022, leaving plenty of room for improvement.
ABA CEO Rob Nichols noted in a press release that “while we’ve made some important progress, more work remains to improve the relationship banks have with their cores.” In other words, technology upgrades alone aren’t enough if the bank–provider relationship is weak.
All Cores Are Not Equal
The 2024 ABA survey broke out satisfaction by core vendor for the first time — revealing that not all providers meet expectations equally. Amongst providers representing 5% or more of respondents, COCC, which is a cooperative owned by its client financial institutions, earned the top satisfaction score. Satisfaction with specific core solutions ranged from over 80% to under 50%, illustrating wide disparities.
As Russell Davis, executive vice president of member experience for the ABA, said in a press release, “When the survey data is analyzed by core provider and core solutions, it becomes crystal clear that all cores are not created equal in the eyes of America’s banks.” Put simply, choosing a core isn’t one-size-fits-all. A community bank’s ideal provider is one whose strengths align with the bank’s strategy and needs.
Long-Term Partners
Core contracts often stretch over many years, and most banks are reluctant to change providers. In the “2024 ABA Core Platforms Survey,” 69% of banks were extremely or somewhat likely to renew with their current core at the next contract, while only 19% were likely to switch.
Long-term relationships don’t signal stagnation. When done with a collaborative approach, they can ignite transformation to enable long-term success. For example, COCC’s long-standing partnerships range from 17 years to more than 30 years.
Over time, satisfaction can dip as contracts age, making it vital to actively nurture the relationship through open communication and shared accountability. When a core provider measures its success by the bank’s success, it builds trust and alignment that translate into proactive problem-solving and dependable support. Dedication to hands-on service and quick response times enhance the partnership by creating a positive impact that extends to the customer long after the ink has dried.
From Integration to Service
The drivers of bank satisfaction have shifted. In 2022, bankers often cited integration gaps and outdated products as reasons to consider switching. By 2024, poor customer service and overall disappointment with their provider topped the list. This suggests that even if technology improves, service quality has become a critical differentiator. Increasingly, how a provider supports a bank is as important as what technology it delivers.
As digital transformation accelerates, banks with adaptable core providers, those able to integrate new features and third-party solutions, remain competitive. Providers that enable open application programming interfaces (APIs) and promote seamless integrations help institutions innovate freely.
Choosing a core provider is a strategic decision, not just a technology purchase. Community and regional banks depend on their providers to collaborate, guide and evolve with them. The ability to launch digital products or meet compliance requirements often hinges on a provider’s flexibility and commitment to shared goals. The strongest relationships treat the provider as part of the team. Transparent communication, clear expectations and proactive service build trust and ensure accountability.
Ultimately, even the most advanced core system won’t deliver its full value if the bank and provider aren’t in sync. The partnership matters as much as the technology. When alignment and trust are high, core systems become engines of innovation. For community and regional banks, the ideal provider combines modern, unified technology with high-touch support, turning the relationship into a long-term advantage.