Executive succession is often thought of and supported as a talent exercise. However, when coupled with strategic compensation planning, boards can ensure a more effective process. The right compensation strategies can keep high-potential executives engaged, encourage the experiences needed for their next job and align both incoming and outgoing leaders with a smooth handoff.

In banking, where internal development is a common route to the CEO role, an effective succession planning process is a value creator. Pay Governance reviewed CEO changes among Russell 3000 banks from 2020 to 2025 and found that less than 3% of banking CEOs were recruited externally. These patterns suggest that succession outcomes are determined years before the formal CEO appointment.

Considering these four compensation strategies can support succession planning and help boards more easily navigate executive leadership transitions.

Four Compensation Strategies to Support Executive Succession Planning
1. Develop the compensation glide path before promotion. Succession can become more difficult when the economics of the new role are negotiated at the time of appointment. Boards can instead pre-approve changes to salary, annual incentive opportunity and long-term incentive opportunity that become effective upon promotion.

A defined step-up provides the candidate with clarity, reduces last-minute compensation negotiations and lets the committee anchor the new package to the scope of the new role, not simply where the predecessor was paid. The framework should remain subject to board discretion and a current assessment of market and company conditions.

2. Establish long-term alignment by making promotion awards. Promotion to the officer ranks changes an executive’s accountability from a business or functional mandate to the performance of the full enterprise. A promotion award can mark that shift and establish an appropriate ownership position aligned with the timing of their ascension.

Vesting periods, performance conditions, ownership guidelines and holding expectations should reinforce sustained performance rather than simply reward the title change itself.

3. Lock-in candidates with retention awards. A credible internal candidate can be most vulnerable to recruitment just as the board identifies them as in the race. A targeted retention award can create a reason to remain through the expected transition window without guaranteeing an officer appointment. Though awards can often be bought out by motivated suitors, the emotional capital from formal recognition can make the difference.

Awards should be sized and timed to address a demonstrated retention risk, not used as an implied promise of promotion.

4. Support an orderly exit for the outgoing executive with thoughtful retirement terms. Proactive maintenance of senior executive compensation arrangements can help facilitate a timely and successful transition. Retirement treatment of outstanding awards and the design of post-employment advisory roles should support cooperation while making clear that authority has passed to the new incumbent.

  • Pre-define the treatment of outstanding incentives to avoid uncertainty or any motivation to delay a planned departure.
  • Where appropriate, include measurable handoff priorities such as shareholder relations, talent transition or completion of defined strategic work.
  • Establish a defined duration, clear scope and reasonable compensation to transfer knowledge without creating competing leadership centers. The objective is continuity, not extended influence. The arrangement should help the successor begin with full authority and the context needed to lead.

The best succession outcomes are built over time. Together, these strategies make compensation a forward-looking component of succession planning rather than a set of decisions made after a successor is identified. The goal is not to predetermine the outcome but rather to retain talent, strengthen readiness and give the board greater flexibility when the transition arrives.

WRITTEN BY

Chris Brindisi

Partner

Chris Brindisi is a Partner at Pay Governance LLC, based in Dallas. He has over 25 years of experience advising clients on a wide range of executive compensation issues. Mr. Brindisi is a leader in the firm’s financial services industry consulting practice, with clients across the spectrum of the industry. Clients include small-, mid- and large-cap banks and diversified financial companies. In addition to his public company clients, he works extensively across ownership structures, including privately owned companies, subsidiaries and large GSEs.

WRITTEN BY

Bryce Gerboc

Principal

Bryce Gerboc is a Principal at Pay Governance LLC, based in Pittsburgh. He has over ten years of experience consulting to compensation committees and senior management on a wide range of executive compensation issues. Mr. Gerboc works for a diverse group of public and private companies across many industries and company sizes including several small- and mid-cap banks and other financial services clients.